Cybersecurity Archives - Viterbi Conversations in Ethics

Fall 2026 Featured Weekly News Profile

When the Sandbox Broke: How an OpenAI Test Breached Hugging Face

OpenAI’s recent internal testing went wrong, where its rogue AI agents broke out of their sandbox environment and infiltrated Hugging Face’s network, performing over 17,000 unauthorized internet actions for four and a half days. This incident is unprecedented in that its attacks are carried out entirely by AI agents, with no human malicious actors, and it also reveals the dangers of AI agents without safety guardrails. It exposes critical gaps in recent AI safety regulations and raises concerns about the future of the cybersecurity landscape.

Spring 2025 Weekly News Profile

Quantum 2.0— The Catalyst for a Cybersecurity Revolution

Mary Karapetyan February 14, 2025 Cybersecurity Quantum Computing

Quantum computing is an emerging technology that leverages the principles of quantum mechanics to increase computational speed. Transitioning from theoretical research to industry, it has the possibility to propel research. While its power is promising, it poses risks to cybersecurity.

Summer 2024 Weekly News Profile

CrowdStrike’s Global Computer Crash Fiasco

Janessi Diaz July 29, 2024 coding CrowdStrike Cybersecurity Microsoft

CrowdStrike released a faulty system update that caused computers to crash on a large scale all over the world. From grounding flights, to delaying medical treatment, the outage reveals the dangers of putting all your cybersecurity defenses into one company.

Volume 5 Issue 3 Winter 2022

Cyberwarfare Conundrum: An Ethical Analysis

Bram Lim February 17, 2022 Cybersecurity Cyberwarfare Hacking

Traditional armed conflict is subject to conventions that govern the way wars are fought and protect those who are not involved. However, thus far, there are no equivalents to the Hague and Geneva Conventions of war for the cyber world, where artillery and explosives are replaced by viruses and malware. Therefore, this paper argues that it is imperative to establish international regulations to keep cyberwarfare ethical, based on the foundations provided by existing warfare conventions.

Spring 2020 Weekly News Profile

Catching Up as the World Moves Online

Isabel Brieler April 7, 2020 Cybersecurity Data Privacy Privacy

4/7/2020 The current COVID-19 pandemic has been devastating for many companies across the globe, but one app has seen its business explode: video conferencing platform…

Podcast

Podcast Spring 2025 Spring 2025 VCE Podcast

Virtue Ethics: Cultivating Moral Character in a Modern World

VCE March 8, 2025

Hosted by Aryan Shah with guest Branden leong This podcast explores the role of virtue ethics in engineering, emphasizing how virtues like compassion, integrity, and…

Podcast Spring 2025 Spring 2025 VCE Podcast

AR/VR and how they shape the future of technology

VCE March 8, 2025

Hosted by Aryan Shah, Deep Shah, with guests “Greta Hoffmeister, Kariena Panpaliya, Dasean Volk, Hang Nguyen, Grace Eamer In this episode, the guests delve into…

Grand Challenges Special Issue

Spring 2023 Volume 6 Issue 3

Redefining Societal Progress for Engineers

Natasha Singh March 29, 2023

Dr. Erin Cech’s critique of the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges focuses heavily on the pitfalls of technological determinism. This paper supports Cech’s argument through a discussion of current examples of the consequences of technological determinism, such as the Black Lives Matter and Me Too movements, medication accessibility, and facial recognition technology. Though the consequences of a zealous engineering mentality are commonplace in our society, there are also current examples of tech companies neglecting to develop technology due to its possible negative consequences.

Spring 2023 Volume 6 Issue 3

How the Technical Sciences and the Social Sciences Should Go Hand-in-Hand

Charles Liu March 29, 2023

The fourteen Grand Challenges presented by the National Academy of Engineers (NAE) fail to involve ethics as a part of the solution to these issues. Traditionally, engineers have kept their work separate from its societal implications. Engineers and their non-technical counterparts have an obligation to view all technical solutions under the moral lens of ethicists and futurists. Going forward, engineers must be aware of their limits and work with experts outside of their fields to develop solutions that will be cognizant of society as a whole.

Spring 2023 Volume 6 Issue 3

The Lies We Tell to Inspire: Responding to the Engineering Double Standard

Shub Gaur March 29, 2023

The National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges are critiqued by Dr. Erin Cech for what she describes as a double standard in engineering. Though Cech rightly discusses a lack of accountability and acknowledgement within the profession, her argument lacks nuance. The Grand Challenges were ultimately a promotional tool meant to inspire the next generation of engineers, yet Cech holds them to a standard of being professional rules and guidelines. This paper will discuss the distinctions that Cech’s argument lacks, including placing an unreasonable amount of responsibility on engineers and overstating their influence.

Spring 2023 Volume 6 Issue 3

The Grand Challenges: Authorial Particularism and a Lost Opportunity for an Equitable Society

Huzaifa Aslam March 29, 2023

The fourteen Grand Challenges were developed by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in an effort to expose future generations to the wide range of innovation and technology that they could one day take part in. As detailed by the Challenges’ creators, the list includes challenges that are most significant to our current world. Dr. Erin Cech’s critique of the Grand Challenges is that a lack of diversity in the panel of engineering experts led to a lack of oversight into issues that are actually pertinent to developing nations. Cech’s argument that the Grand Challenges are a missed opportunity for social justice holds validity, but her mischaracterization of the lack of diversity requires further consideration.

Weekly News Profile

Fall 2026 Featured Weekly News Profile

New York City Bans Artificial Intelligence in Early Education

Ethan Chen September 20, 2026

New York City has announced an extensive AI moratorium in its public schools, restricting many AI apps and services. While advancements in AI have strong potential educational applications, rushed implementations raise concerns about the appropriate use of technology and socioemotional development in early education. In a society where AI tools proliferate rapidly, the ban is one step toward slowing the pace and ensuring schools do not miss the fundamental goal of providing quality education to students.

Fall 2026 Featured Weekly News Profile

When the Sandbox Broke: How an OpenAI Test Breached Hugging Face

Mo Jiang September 20, 2026

Featured Spring 2026 Weekly News Profile

Too Helpful to Help: AI, OCD, and Ethical Oversight

Alice Steele April 27, 2026

As Large Language Models are integrated into daily life, there is emerging research that suggests this kind of AI can worsen reassurance-seeking compulsions in users with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). This exemplifies a larger issue of disability and accessibility as an afterthought in engineering projects. As a result, systems like AI can harm groups of people that were overlooked in the design process, which is unacceptable in the case of technologies intended to be integrated on such a large scale.

Featured Spring 2026 Weekly News Profile

EU Children Kicked Off Social Media

Kariena Panpaliya April 22, 2026

The European Union has introduced an Age Verification App as part of ongoing efforts to restrict children’s access to platforms such as social media apps and adult websites. Aside from the controversies surrounding age verification and restriction, the app was found to be very flawed. The developments on restricting children from online threats continue across many European nations.

Featured Spring 2026 Weekly News Profile

The Artemis II Mission: Ethical Concerns of Deep Space Organ-on-a-Chip Research

Mo Jiang April 14, 2026

NASA’s Artemis II mission is the first space mission to use “organ-on-a-chip” technology to study the effects of deep-space radiation and microgravity on human biological “avatars.” While this research helps establish safety guidelines for future Mars missions, it also raises questions about the ethics of human experimentation and the regulations governing deep space research. This mission points out a regulatory gap between government-led missions and the commercial space sector, raising concerns about the long-term protection and dignity of human subjects in deep space.